The legal framework, in practical terms.
What makes a contract valid
Under Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an agreement is a legally enforceable contract only if it is made by the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and a lawful object, and is not expressly declared void. A valid proposal (Section 2) must be met by an absolute and unqualified acceptance (Section 7); a conditional or altered acceptance is a counter-offer. Consideration need not be adequate, but it must be real and lawful, and an agreement without it is generally void (Section 25), subject to limited exceptions. Consent must be free of coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation and mistake (Sections 13 to 22). Only a person of the age of majority and sound mind can contract (Section 11), so a contract with a minor is void from the outset.
Void and voidable agreements
Void agreements have no legal effect from the start, for example an agreement with a minor, or one in restraint of trade under Section 27. Voidable contracts, such as one induced by fraud, are valid until the affected party chooses to set them aside. Which category a term falls into decides your remedy, and drafting to avoid a void clause is core to a lawyer’s work. Under Section 23, an agreement is also void if its object or consideration is unlawful or opposed to public policy.
Electronic contracts and digital signatures
Contracts formed by email, click-wrap or an online platform are valid and enforceable in India. Section 10A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 confirms that a contract is not unenforceable merely because it was formed electronically, and digital and electronic signatures carry legal validity under that Act, subject to its conditions.
Breach and damages
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 doesn’t just define what makes a contract valid, it also governs what happens when one is broken. Sections 73 and 74 deal with compensation for breach, including how liquidated damages and penalty clauses are treated by Indian courts, which is directly relevant to how you draft your damages and remedies clauses.
Sale of goods
If your commercial contract involves the sale of goods, rather than services, the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 applies alongside the Contract Act, and implies certain conditions and warranties into the deal (such as title and merchantable quality) even if your contract doesn’t spell them out. Knowing this matters when you’re drafting, since silence in your contract doesn’t mean silence in law.
Enforcement: specific performance
The Specific Relief Act, 1963, as amended in 2018, governs your remedies if the other party doesn’t perform. The 2018 amendment was a significant shift, it made specific performance (a court order compelling actual performance of the contract, not just damages) the default remedy for many categories of contract, rather than the exception it used to be. This changes the practical leverage a well-drafted commercial contract gives you if the other side breaches.
Stamping
Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and the corresponding state stamp act where your contract is executed, most commercial contracts need to be properly stamped. An unstamped or under-stamped contract can face real admissibility problems if you ever need to rely on it in court, this is a common, avoidable mistake that has nothing to do with the contract’s actual terms and everything to do with paperwork discipline. See our note on whether a contract is valid without stamp paper in India for more.
Dispute resolution
Most well-drafted commercial contracts include an arbitration clause under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, since arbitration is generally faster and more private than litigation for commercial disputes. We cover the choice between mediation, arbitration, and litigation in more detail separately.