The regulatory landscape has shifted, and it decides deal timelines.
India’s merger control regime changed materially in September 2024, and any credible M&A adviser needs to be working from the current position, not last cycle’s rules.
CCI merger control and the Deal Value Threshold
Combinations crossing the prescribed asset or turnover thresholds under Sections 5 and 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 require prior approval from the Competition Commission of India, and cannot close until cleared. The Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023, operative from September 2024, added a Deal Value Threshold: transactions valued above ₹2,000 crore now require notification where the target has substantial business operations in India, irrespective of whether the traditional asset or turnover thresholds are met, and the small-target exemption does not apply in those cases. The amendments also codified “material influence” as the control standard and introduced a 150-day outer review limit.
Gun-jumping is real enforcement risk
Implementing any part of a notifiable deal before CCI approval, combining operations, changing management, sharing competitively sensitive information, is gun-jumping, and it carries significant penalties. Recent enforcement, including a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 2026 on a historic combination penalty, has put a sharp focus on how transactions are notified and what is disclosed. Sequencing matters as much as the deal terms.
NCLT, Companies Act, and financing
Mergers by scheme of arrangement run through the National Company Law Tribunal under the Companies Act, with fast-track routes for qualifying intra-group reorganisations. On the financing side, a 2025 RBI framework opened the door for Indian banks to fund corporate acquisitions, a genuine structural change to how deals can be financed, though bank loan covenants bring their own considerations.